Gujarat Exclusive > National-World > Kalyan Singh Demands Backward Place in Ram Temple Trust

Kalyan Singh Demands Backward Place in Ram Temple Trust

0
473

As soon as the trust is announced for the construction of Ram temple different demands of different people have started coming up. Due to the BJP government at the center and in the state, people close to the BJP party are now openly putting their demands in front of the government.

Former Chief Minister Kalyan Singh, who took moral responsibility for the demolition of the disputed structure of Babri Masjid has also demanded the inclusion of an OBC in the 15-member trust. On the other hand, Mahant Nritya Gopal Das and the president of Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas said that there is no need to make anyone president during his stay. Along with Vishwa Hindu Parishad, former BJP MP and Ram Janmabhoomi agitator Ram Vilas Vedanti demanded Mahant Nritya Gopal Das to be the chairman of the trust. Apart from this, Zafaryab Jeelani of Babri Masjid Action Committee and AIMIM President Asaduddin Owaisi have questioned the timing of the announcement linking the government declaration of trust with Delhi elections.

Former UP Chief Minister Kalyan Singh said that the government should also include an OBC along with a Dalit in the trust. He said that the number of OBCs is the highest, so at least one OBC should be included in the temple trust. Kalyan Singh said that he does not want to be a part of the trust himself but an OBC must be taken on his behalf. He has also described Nritya Gopal Das as the right person for the post of president. Mahant Nritya Gopal Das, president of Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas has said that the name of president of Ram Mandir Trust is not required to be announced as the president will be the same. Nritya expressed happiness over the announcement, saying that PM Modi and CM Yogi deserve respect for this. He said that he wants to lay the foundation stone in Ram Navami. Nritya said that it is a good decision to give land to Muslims in Sohawal. He said that Owaisi’s statement had no meaning.