Gujarat Exclusive > Gujarat news > Gujarat High Court holds Yatin Oza guilty of contempt of court

Gujarat High Court holds Yatin Oza guilty of contempt of court


The Gujarat High Court on Tuesday held advocate Yatin Oza guilty of contempt in a suo motu case against him. Oza, president of the Gujarat High Court Advocates’ Association (GHCAA) had called the court a gambling den.

The division bench of Justices Sonia Gokani and N V Anjaria held Oza guilty of criminal contempt. His sentencing will be pronounced on Wednesday.

After the remark, Oza had apologised but the high court refused to accept his unconditional apology. He was also stripped of his senior advocate designation for the remark made against the court. Oza remarked at a press conference held on Facebook Live on June 6.

The Supreme Court had on June 16 refused to entertain his plea against the contempt proceedings, saying he should go back to the HC.

The Gujarat high court initiated a suo motu contempt proceedings against Oza for calling it a gambling den and an institution which caters only to the litigants with means and money power, smugglers and those who are traitors.

The court termed his remarks as extremely unfortunate and unpalatable. The court said Yatin Oza made false and contemptuous allegations of corruption, malpractices against the administration of the High Court.

Also Read: Gujarat COVID-19 Update: 1,335 new cases

The full court of the Gujarat HC had recently rejected his apology. It had also rejected his request to re-confer him his previous designation as a senior advocate.

What the court said about Yatin Oza’s remark

The court said Yatin Oza made the critical remarks to spread sensationalism and said such remarks appear to have been made without any substantive basis and without any intent to know the truth as also without approaching the honourable Chief Justice for any inquiry as the head of the institution.

“The President of the bar has, by his scandalous expressions and indiscriminate as well as baseless utterances, has attempted to cause serious damage to the prestige and majesty of the High Court and thereby of an independent judiciary,” the court said.

“He also attempted to lower the image of the entire administration and also created a demoralising effect among the administrative wing,” media reports quoted the court as saying.


To read the latest news in Gujarati click here